ByteVerity
ByteVerity Technology

Deterministic AI Governance

We replaced probabilistic guardrails with cryptographic guarantees. Here's how Avarion ensures your AI coding agents are safe, auditable, and compliant.

Hermetic Generation

Standard agents read from a "live" file system, leading to race conditions and context contamination. Avarion agents operate in a Hermetic Container, accessing only a frozen, content-addressed snapshot of the context.

  • Reproducible outputs from identical inputs
  • No external network access during generation
  • Deterministic behavior for audit trails

Merkle-Hashed Provenance

We treat your codebase like a blockchain. Every file, every dependency, and every work unit is hashed. A change in a low-level utility library ripples up the Merkle tree, invalidating all dependent features.

  • SHA-256 cryptographic hashes
  • Tamper-evident audit trails
  • Automatic dependency invalidation

The "Zit" Lifecycle

Avarion enforces a strict state machine for every atomic unit of work (Zit). Each stage requires specific artifacts before progression is allowed.

DRAFTRESEARCHEDIMPLEMENTEDAUDITED

Skipping stages is impossible. Each transition is cryptographically verified.

Memory Cortex

Traditional RAG is dumb. Avarion uses a Memory Cortex to store "Knowledge Atoms"—governed, versioned snippets of corporate wisdom.

  • Vector-based semantic retrieval (Qdrant)
  • Vetted patterns from human experts
  • Prevents propagation of bad practices
ML Detection Engine

AI Code Detection: 95.6% F1 Score

Our multi-signal detection engine combines five independent methods for maximum accuracy in identifying AI-generated code.

ML CodeBERT
98%

Fine-tuned Contrastive CodeBERT model trained on AI vs human code patterns. Highest accuracy signal.

Annotation Detection
95%

Detects AI tool signatures, comments, and metadata left by Copilot, Claude, and Cursor.

Pattern Detection
65%

Identifies structural patterns common in AI-generated code (naming, formatting, boilerplate).

Timing Heuristics
50%

Analyzes code generation speed and burst patterns that indicate AI assistance.

Git Metadata
40%

Examines commit patterns, author metadata, and change frequency for AI signatures.

Combined Score
95.6%

Weighted ensemble aggregation produces a single confidence score for AI attribution.

95.6%

F1 Score

96.2%

Precision

95.0%

Recall

<2%

False Positive Rate

Agent Attribution

Not just "is this AI-generated?" but "which AI generated it?" We identify the specific coding assistant.

GitHub Copilot

Inline suggestions

C

Claude Code

Terminal agent

Cursor

AI-first IDE

D

Devin

Autonomous agent

+ support for additional agents including Windsurf, Tabnine, Amazon Q, and custom models

Want to dive deeper?

Read our comprehensive ML technical report or schedule a demo to see the technology in action.